ᱥᱟᱯᱲᱟᱣ ᱪᱟᱞᱟᱜᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟᱼᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ

{{Infobox writing system
| name=ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟᱼᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ
| altname=বাংলা-অসমীয়া
| sample=18th Century Eastern Nagari Text.svg
| imagesize=320px
| type=[[ᱟᱵᱩᱜᱤᱫᱟ]]
| languages=[[ᱚᱥᱚᱢᱤᱭᱟ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ]], [[ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ]], [[ᱵᱤᱥᱱᱩ ᱯᱨᱤᱭᱟ ᱢᱳᱱᱤᱯᱩᱨᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱵᱤᱥᱱᱩᱯᱨᱤᱭᱟ ᱢᱟᱱᱤᱯᱩᱨᱤ]], [[ᱢᱮᱭᱛᱮᱭ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱢᱮᱭᱛᱮᱭ]], [[ᱥᱤᱞᱮᱴᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱥᱤᱞᱮᱴᱤ]], [[ᱠᱚᱠᱵᱚᱨᱚᱠ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ]], [[ᱜᱟᱨᱚ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱜᱟᱨᱚ]], [[ᱦᱟᱡᱚᱝ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱦᱟᱡᱚᱝ]], [[ᱪᱟᱠᱢᱟ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱪᱟᱠᱢᱟ]], [[ᱪᱚᱴᱴᱚ ᱜᱽᱨᱟᱢᱤᱭᱟ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱪᱚᱴᱴᱚᱜᱽᱨᱟᱢᱤᱭᱟ]], [[ᱢᱟᱭᱛᱷᱤᱞᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱢᱳᱹᱭᱛᱷᱤᱞᱤ]], [[ᱨᱚᱝᱯᱩᱨᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱠᱟᱢᱛᱟᱯᱩᱨᱤ]] ᱟᱨ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱠᱚ
| time=c. ᱑᱑᱐᱐–ᱱᱤᱛ
| fam1=[[ᱯᱨᱳᱴᱳ-ᱥᱤᱱᱟᱭᱴᱤᱠ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ]] <sup>[ᱚ]</sup>
| fam2=[[ᱯᱷᱳᱱᱤᱥᱤᱭᱟᱹᱱ]] <sup>[ᱚ]</sup>
| fam3=[[ᱟᱨᱟᱢᱟᱭᱤᱠ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ|ᱟᱨᱟᱢᱟᱭᱤᱠ]] <sup>[ᱚ]</sup>
| footnotes=[ᱚ] ᱵᱨᱟᱢᱦᱤ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱥᱮᱢᱮᱴᱤᱠ ᱥᱤᱨᱡᱚᱱ ᱥᱟᱱᱟᱢ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱫᱚ ᱵᱟᱝ ᱠᱚ ᱢᱟᱱᱟᱣᱟ᱾<ref name="salomon-brahmi">'The theory of a Semitic origin for Brahmi, [as opposed to Indus origin], does have a strong, if not entirely conclusive, body of concrete evidence in its favor.' and 'For even many of the supporters of the Semitic hypothesis concede that, in Dani's words, "[T]he BrahmT letters are not literally 'derived' from the Semitic letters as is commonly understood, but are only based on them" (DIP 29).' {{harvcol|Salomon|1998|p=29}}</ref> 
| fam4=[[ᱵᱨᱟᱢᱦᱤ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ|ᱵᱨᱟᱢᱦᱤ]]<ref name="salomon-brahmi"/>
| fam5=[[ᱜᱩᱯᱛᱟ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ|ᱜᱩᱯᱛᱟ]]<ref name="salomon-gupta">'The terminology for the various premodern Brahmi-derived scripts is, however, largely unstandardized and typically made up ad hoc, due mainly to the lack of attested indigenous terms for many of them (2.1.1). D. C. Sircar broadly categorizes the stages of development into "Early," "Middle," and "Late Brahmi" periods, corresponding (in northern India) to the third through first centuries B.C., the first century B.C. through third century A.D., and the fourth through sixth centuries A.D., respectively (HEP 113), though others refer to his "Late Brahmi" as "Gupta script".' {{harvcol|Salomon|1998|p=19}}</ref>
| fam6=[[ᱥᱤᱫᱽᱫᱷᱚᱢ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ|ᱥᱤᱫᱽᱫᱷᱚᱢ]]<ref name="salomon-siddham">"Around the late sixth century, the so-called Gupta script of northern India evolved into a distinct new script for which the preferred name is Siddhamatrka." {{harvcol|Salomon|1998|p=39}}</ref>
| fam7=[[ᱜᱳᱣᱲᱤ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ|ᱜᱳᱣᱲᱤ]]<ref name="salomon-gaudi">"In the northeast, the local derivative of Siddhamatrka was the script knownas Proto-Bengali or Gaudi, which was current from the tenth to the fourteenth centuries." {{harvcol|Salomon|1998|p=41}}</ref>
| children= [[ᱚᱥᱚᱢᱤᱭᱟ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ|ᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ]], [[ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ|ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ]], [[ᱚᱝᱜᱚ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ]]
| unicode=[https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0980.pdf U+0980–U+09FF] (ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ),<br />[https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U11480.pdf U+011480–U+0114DF] (ᱛᱤᱨᱦᱩᱛᱟ)
| iso15924=Beng}}
{{Contains special characters|Bengali}}
{{brahmic}}
'''ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟᱼᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ'''<ref name="salomon41"/> (ᱥᱮ '''ᱥᱟᱢᱟᱝ ᱱᱟᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ'''<ref>"The Eastern Nagri script was first created to write Sanskrit and later adopted by regional languages like Bengali and Assamese. The Bengali Unicode block of characters is created from the Eastern Nagri script and contains character variants, like for the ‘r’, that is different in Bengali and Assamese." {{harvcol|Simard|Dopierala|Thaut|2020|p=5f}}</ref>), [[ᱵᱨᱟᱦᱢᱤ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ]] ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱩᱛᱱᱟᱹᱣ ᱟᱠᱟᱱ ᱱᱟᱦᱟᱜ ᱥᱟᱢᱟᱝ ᱱᱟᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ᱾<ref>See "Parent Systems" on the right, and the citations therein.</ref> [[ᱜᱳᱣᱲᱤ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ]] ᱫᱚ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱢᱟᱨᱮ ᱦᱟᱯᱲᱟᱢ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ ᱢᱮᱱᱛᱮ ᱞᱮᱠᱷᱟᱜ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ᱾<ref>{{harvcol|Salomon|1998|p=41}}</ref> ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ ᱨᱚᱲᱼᱦᱚᱲ ᱴᱷᱮᱱ ''ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ''<ref>" Bengalis will refer to the script as the 'Bengali script'.." {{harvcol|Brandt|2014|p=24}}</ref>, ᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ ᱨᱚᱲᱼᱦᱚᱲ ᱴᱷᱮᱱ ''ᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ''<ref>"Assamese has, like Bengali, a long literary tradition in this script which Assamese speakers naturally refer to as the 'Assamese script'." {{harvcol|Brandt|2014|p=25}}</ref> ᱟᱨ ᱚᱞᱚᱜ ᱯᱟᱲᱦᱟᱣ ᱠᱚᱨᱮ ᱫᱚ ᱥᱟᱢᱟᱝ ᱱᱟᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱢᱮᱱᱛᱮ ᱵᱟᱲᱟᱭᱚᱜᱼᱟ᱾<ref>"In fact, the term 'Eastern Nagari' seems to be the only designation which does not favour one or the other language. However, it is only applied in academic discourses, whereas the name 'Bengali script' dominates the global public sphere." {{harvcol|Brandt|2014|p=25}}</ref>

[[ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ]] ᱟᱨ [[ᱚᱥᱚᱢᱤᱭᱟ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱚᱥᱚᱢᱤᱭᱟ]] ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱵᱮᱜᱚᱨ ᱦᱚᱸ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱫᱚ [[ᱵᱤᱥᱱᱩ ᱯᱨᱤᱭᱟ ᱢᱳᱱᱤᱯᱩᱨᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱵᱤᱥᱱᱩᱯᱨᱤᱭᱟ ᱢᱟᱱᱤᱯᱩᱨᱤ]], [[ᱪᱟᱠᱢᱟ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱪᱟᱠᱢᱟ]], [[ᱢᱮᱭᱛᱮᱭ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱢᱮᱭᱛᱮᱭ]] (ᱢᱟᱱᱤᱯᱩᱨ), [[ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤ]] ᱟᱨ [[ᱥᱤᱞᱮᱴᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱥᱤᱞᱮᱴᱤ]] ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱚᱞ ᱨᱮᱦᱚᱸ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱚᱜᱼᱟ᱾<ref>"Already the fact that most Bengalis will refer to the script of their language exclusively as the 'Bengali script', though it is used for many other languages as well, e.g. Assamese, Bishnupriya, Chakma, Meitei, Santali, etc. gives a glimpse of the dominant role of the Bengali language in the eastern part of South Asia {{harvcol|Brandt|2014|pp=25–26}}</ref><ref>Bijan Kumar Roy, Subal Chandra Biswas and Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay, [http://ijkcdt.net/xml/17110/17110.pdf Designing Unicode‐compliant Indic‐script based Institutional Digital Repository with special reference to Bengali], page 55, International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology Vol.8, No.3, 53-67 (September, 2018)</ref> ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ, ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱢᱟᱨᱮ ᱟᱨ ᱛᱟᱞᱢᱟ ᱤᱱᱫᱳᱼᱟᱨᱡᱚ ᱟᱨ ᱱᱤᱛ ᱦᱚᱸ ᱥᱚᱸᱥᱠᱨᱤᱛ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱚᱜ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ᱾<ref name="brandt-sohoni-2018-7"/> ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱠᱚ ᱡᱮᱞᱮᱠᱟ, [[ᱟᱝᱜᱤᱠᱟ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱟᱝᱜᱤᱠᱟ]], [[ᱵᱳᱲᱳ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱵᱚᱰᱚ]], [[ᱠᱟᱨᱵᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱠᱟᱨᱵᱤ]], [[ᱢᱟᱭᱛᱷᱤᱞᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱢᱳᱹᱭᱛᱷᱤᱞᱤ]] ᱟᱨ [[ᱢᱤᱥᱤᱝ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱢᱤᱥᱤᱝ]] ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱨᱮ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱚᱠᱛᱚ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱚᱜᱼᱟ ᱠᱟᱱ ᱛᱟᱦᱮᱸᱱᱟ᱾<ref>Prabhakara, M S {{usurped|[https://web.archive.org/web/20070710202520/http://www.hinduonnet.com/2005/05/19/stories/2005051904051100.htm Scripting a solution]}}, The Hindu, 19 May 2005.</ref>

==ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ==
ᱵᱤᱥᱮᱥ ᱠᱟᱭᱛᱮ ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟᱼᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ ᱫᱚ ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸᱱ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱥᱟᱶ ᱡᱚᱯᱲᱟᱣ ᱵᱟᱝ ᱛᱟᱦᱮᱸ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ, ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱛᱟᱞᱢᱟ ᱡᱩᱜᱽ ᱨᱮ ᱥᱤᱧᱚᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱥᱟᱢᱟᱝ ᱴᱚᱴᱷᱟ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ [[ᱥᱚᱸᱥᱠᱨᱤᱛ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ|ᱥᱚᱸᱥᱠᱨᱤᱛ]] ᱥᱟᱶᱛᱮ ᱢᱟᱨᱮ ᱟᱨ ᱛᱟᱞᱢᱟᱼᱤᱱᱫᱳᱼᱟᱨᱡᱚ ᱠᱚ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱢᱩᱬᱩᱛ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱛᱟᱦᱮᱸ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ᱾<ref name="brandt-sohoni-2018-7">"(T)he script used today for Assamese and Bengali was, by origin, linked to the region and not any one specific modern language. Historically, it was in fact used for Old and Middle Indo-Aryan. Today it is used not only for other modern languages (e.g. Bishnupriya) but also still for Sanskrit." {{harvcol|Brandt|Sohoni|2018|p=7}}</ref> ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱥᱟᱱᱟᱢ ᱢᱚᱜᱚᱫᱷ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ ᱜᱮ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱪᱩᱨᱤᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱦᱚᱨᱟ ᱛᱮ ᱡᱚᱯᱲᱟᱣ ᱢᱮᱱᱟᱜᱼᱟ, ᱢᱮᱱᱠᱷᱟᱱ ᱫᱮᱵᱽᱱᱟᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱵᱷᱮᱜᱟᱨ ᱜᱮᱭᱟ᱾  ᱥᱮᱫᱟᱭ ᱥᱤᱧᱚᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱢᱟᱨᱮ ᱥᱤᱞᱮᱵᱟᱨᱤ ''ᱵᱽᱨᱟᱦᱢᱤ'' ᱫᱚ ᱮᱛᱚᱢ ᱥᱤᱧᱚᱛᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤᱠᱚ ᱥᱟᱶᱛᱮ ᱫᱮᱵᱽᱱᱟᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸ ᱫᱚ ᱠᱞᱟᱥᱤᱠᱟᱞ ᱥᱚᱸᱥᱠᱨᱤᱛ ᱟᱨ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱤᱱᱫᱳᱼᱟᱨᱡᱚ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤᱠᱚ ᱚᱞ ᱨᱮ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱚᱜᱼᱟ, ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱯᱷᱮᱰᱟᱛ (source) ᱠᱟᱱᱟ᱾<ref name=ComB/>

ᱱᱟᱦᱟᱜ ᱥᱟᱢᱟᱝ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ ᱠᱚ (ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟᱼᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ, ᱳᱰᱤᱭᱟ ᱟᱨ ᱢᱳᱹᱭᱛᱷᱤᱞᱤ) ᱑᱔ᱟᱱ ᱟᱨ ᱑᱕ᱟᱱ ᱥᱟᱭᱚᱛ ᱨᱮ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱦᱟᱯᱲᱟᱢ [[ᱜᱳᱣᱲᱤ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ|ᱜᱳᱣᱲᱤ]] ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱵᱷᱟᱜᱮ ᱞᱮᱠᱟ ᱜᱮ ᱵᱷᱮᱜᱟᱨ ᱞᱮᱱᱟ᱾<ref name="salomon41">"This, in turn, gave rise to the modern eastern scripts, namely, Bengali-Assamese, Oriya, and Maithili, which became clearly differentiated around the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries." {{harvcol|Salomon|1998|p=41}}</ref> ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ, ᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ ᱟᱨ [[ᱢᱤᱛᱷᱤᱞᱟ ᱴᱚᱴᱷᱟ|ᱢᱤᱛᱷᱤᱞᱟ]] ᱪᱤᱠᱤ ᱠᱚ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱜᱮ ᱛᱟᱦᱮᱸᱭᱮᱱ ᱨᱮᱦᱚᱸ ᱑᱓-᱑᱔ᱟᱱ ᱥᱟᱭᱚᱛ ᱨᱮ [[ᱳᱰᱤᱭᱟ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ]] ᱟᱡᱟᱜ ᱪᱮᱛᱟᱱ ᱦᱤᱸᱥ ᱵᱟᱸᱠᱟ ᱫᱷᱟᱨᱟ ᱛᱮ ᱩᱛᱱᱟᱹᱣ ᱠᱷᱟᱹᱛᱤᱨ ᱟᱹᱰᱤ ᱛᱮᱫ ᱜᱮ ᱵᱷᱮᱜᱟᱨ ᱮᱱᱟ᱾<ref>"[T]he phase when the curved tops - so prominent now in many of the Oriya letters - were just appearing, initiating the parting of ways from the proto-[Bengali-Assamese-Maithili] phase. The beginning and progress of this trend can be noticed in many of the Orissa [inscriptions] of the 13th-14th centuries A.D." {{harvcol|Bhattacharya|1969|p=56f}}</ref> ᱢᱟᱨᱮ ᱢᱳᱹᱭᱛᱷᱤᱞᱤ ᱨᱮ ᱱᱤᱛ ᱦᱚᱸ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱱᱟᱜ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ ᱜᱮ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱚᱜᱼᱟ ᱟᱨ ᱢᱳᱹᱭᱛᱷᱤᱞᱤ ᱯᱚᱸᱰᱮᱛ ᱠᱚ (ᱵᱤᱥᱮᱥ ᱠᱟᱭᱛᱮ ᱢᱟᱨᱮ ᱦᱟᱯᱲᱟᱢ) ᱱᱤᱛ ᱦᱚᱸ ᱥᱚᱸᱥᱠᱨᱤᱛ ᱚᱞ ᱨᱮ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ ᱠᱚ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱮᱫ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ᱾<ref name=MajR/><ref>Atindra Mojumder, ''Bengali Language: Historical Grammar'' (Part 1), page 22, Firma K. L. Mukhopadhyay, 1972</ref>

==ᱪᱤᱠᱤ==
{{ᱟᱨᱦᱚᱸ|ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ|ᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ|ᱛᱤᱨᱩᱦᱩᱛᱟ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ}}

==ᱭᱩᱱᱤᱠᱳᱰ ᱨᱮ==
==ᱵᱟᱨᱦᱮ ᱡᱚᱱᱚᱲ==
* [http://omniglot.com/writing/assamese.htm ᱳᱢᱱᱤᱜᱽᱞᱳᱴ – ᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱥ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ]
* [http://www.omniglot.com/writing/bengali.htm ᱳᱢᱱᱤᱜᱽᱞᱳᱴ – ᱵᱟᱝᱞᱟ ᱪᱤᱠᱤ]

==ᱥᱟᱹᱠᱷᱟᱹᱭᱟᱹᱛ==